1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1290 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Minica |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2350 mm |