1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 148 kg more than 1955 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3270 mm |