1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC70 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC70. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | XC70 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2660 mm |