1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2006 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | 300 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3050 mm |