1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Mazda CX-7. (244 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda CX-7.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
