1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2006 Nissan 350Z is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2006 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1955 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan 350Z has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan 350Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1955 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3491 cc |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2660 mm |