1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (177 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 198 kg more than 1955 Cadillac 62.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S60 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2198 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2720 mm |