1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (263 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2880 mm |