1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2008 Dodge Charger. (178 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 309 kg more than 2008 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 178 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3050 mm |
