1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Hummer H3
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Hummer H3 (300 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | 62 | H3 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2180 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2850 mm |
