1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Lexus LS
To start off, 2008 Lexus LS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lexus LS (380 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2008 Lexus LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Lexus LS | |
Make | Cadillac | Lexus |
Model | 62 | LS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4608 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2980 mm |