1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 2010 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2010 BMW 325 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | 325 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2770 mm |