1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (368 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 147 kg more than 2010 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Charger |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 368 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3048 mm |