1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2010 Kia Carnival. (142 HP @ 8800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 220 kg more than 1955 Cadillac 62.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | 62 | Carnival |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2902 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2910 mm |
