1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2845 mm |