1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 640 (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 640 should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2012 BMW 640.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2012 BMW 640 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | 640 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4894 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1894 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1365 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2855 mm |