1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3967 mm |