1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1955 Cadillac 62.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1955 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2012 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1955 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2860 mm |