1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 BMW 6 series
To start off, 2013 BMW 6 series is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 6 series (439 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 6 series should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 61 kg more than 2013 BMW 6 series.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2013 BMW 6 series | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | 62 | 6 series |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 439 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1939 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5009 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2081 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1392 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2968 mm |
