1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 614 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1955 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2013 Lotus Evora has manual transmission. 2013 Lotus Evora will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1955 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | 62 | Evora |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2575 mm |
