1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Smart |
| Model | 62 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 1867 mm |
