1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton would be higher. At 4,841 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Half-Ton | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4841 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
