1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton would be higher. At 4,841 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Chevrolet Half-Ton | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Half-Ton | 6 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4841 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |