1955 Chrysler Imperial vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1955 Chrysler Imperial. (247 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1955 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1722 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus Emme. (354 Nm). This means 1955 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Chrysler Imperial | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Imperial | Emme |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 470 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2770 mm |
