1955 Chrysler Imperial vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (664 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 417 more horse power than 1955 Chrysler Imperial. (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM should accelerate faster than 1955 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 990 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (773 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Chrysler Imperial. (470 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Chrysler Imperial.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Chrysler Imperial | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Imperial | CLK LM |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 664 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 773 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2600 mm |