1955 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2001 Ford Puma
To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2001 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1365 kg more than 2001 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Puma. (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1955 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Chrysler Imperial | 2001 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Imperial | Puma |
Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2450 mm |