1955 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (144 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1008 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (344 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1955 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Chrysler Imperial | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Imperial | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 344 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2650 mm |