1955 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 915 kg more than 2003 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1955 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Chrysler Imperial | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | Imperial | ZT |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2760 mm |