1955 Chrysler Windsor vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 530 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1955 Chrysler Windsor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Chrysler Windsor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Chrysler Windsor | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Windsor | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4920 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2680 mm |
