1955 Chrysler Windsor vs. 1999 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1999 Mercury Sable is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 5,420 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 298 kg more than 1999 Mercury Sable.
Because 1955 Chrysler Windsor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Chrysler Windsor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Chrysler Windsor | 1999 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | Windsor | Sable |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5420 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1602 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
