1955 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Chrysler Windsor (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Chrysler Windsor should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 1175 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Chrysler Windsor | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Windsor | M250 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4920 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2520 mm |
