1955 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1955 Chrysler Windsor. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1955 Chrysler Windsor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 255 kg more than 2013 Volkswagen Eos.
Because 1955 Chrysler Windsor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Chrysler Windsor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Chrysler Windsor | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | Windsor | Eos |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4920 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2578 mm |