1955 Citroen 2CV vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1955 Citroen 2CV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 922 kg more than 1955 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Citroen 2CV | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Crestline |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 12 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 558 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2940 mm |
