1955 Citroen 2CV vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Citroen 2CV | 1992 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | 2CV | XJS |
Year Released | 1955 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 12 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 82 L |