1955 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 355 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 870 kg more than 1955 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Citroen 2CV 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make Citroen Mercedes-Benz
Model 2CV CLK
Year Released 1955 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 425 cc 5500 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type boxer V
Horse Power 12 HP 367 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 558 kg 1428 kg
Vehicle Length 3610 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 L 88 L