1955 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 804 kg more than 1955 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (340 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | S40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 12 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 25 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |