1955 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | 5 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 424 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 12 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 25 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |