1955 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Citroen | Renault |
| Model | 2CV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 12 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 25 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 50 L |
