1955 DKW F 89 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1955 DKW F 89 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Holden FX (51 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 89. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1955 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW F 89 | 1952 Holden FX | |
| Make | DKW | Holden |
| Model | F 89 | FX |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 51 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
