1955 DKW F 89 vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 89. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 DKW F 89 weights approximately 232 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW F 89 | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | F 89 | Emme |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 260 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 678 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |