1955 DKW F 89 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 438 kg more than 1955 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW F 89 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |