1955 DKW F 91 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 91. (38 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 91. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 615 kg more than 1955 DKW F 91. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW F 91. (79 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW F 91 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | DKW | MG |
Model | F 91 | ZT |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 895 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 215 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2760 mm |