1955 DKW F 91 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 91. (38 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 91.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 DKW F 91. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW F 91. (79 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW F 91 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 91 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 895 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.5 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2840 mm |
