1955 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 1966 Holden HD is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 DKW Munga weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1955 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Munga | 1966 Holden HD | |
| Make | DKW | Holden |
| Model | Munga | HD |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
