1955 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Volvo V40
To start off, 1996 Volvo V40 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,731 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo V40 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 DKW Munga weights approximately 50 kg more than 1996 Volvo V40.
Because 1955 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Volvo V40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo V40 (164 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW Munga | 1996 Volvo V40 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | V40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 1731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 164 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2570 mm |