1955 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga.
Because 1955 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Dodge Dakota. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW Munga | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Munga | Dakota |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71.1 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3340 mm |