1955 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander (230 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 435 kg more than 1955 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander (291 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Munga | 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Munga | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 291 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4666 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
