1955 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga.
Because 1955 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Munga | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | Munga | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2360 mm |
