1955 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga.
Because 1955 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW Munga | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Munga | E |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |