1955 DKW Universal vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 600 kg more than 1955 DKW Universal.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW Universal | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Universal | Challenger |
Year Released | 1955 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 5562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2800 mm |